图片澳门金沙现金网
期刊简介
图片
《海外政事经济学褒贬》(Review of International Political Economy)是一份涵盖海外政事经济学究诘的双月刊同业评审学术期刊。其诞生于1999年，由Routledge出书。本刊是海外政事经济学规模的主流期刊之一，与《新政事经济学》(New Political Economy)比肩。2022年该刊影响因子为4.3。
本期目次
01
真人博彩平台开户送彩金社会环境迫害与地皮解决：中国在阿根廷基础法子投资究诘
Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina
02
“非端庄”住房问题的政事经济学：后殖民国度的轨制羼杂性
Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state
03
主权危险金融中的海外轨制的复杂性：区域架构的比拟
International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures
澳门银银河手机版皇冠信用最新地址04
核不扩散轨制复合体系的不矫健性
The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex
05
解决蚁集空间：跨组织的策略范畴的政事
Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations
勇士在这个休赛期，做出的最大一笔交易，就是以普尔作为筹码，从奇才得到保罗。普尔被交易，基本算是在大家预料之中的事情。NBA名宿就在采访中提到普尔的交易话题。
06
竞争与轨制的复杂架构：海外赞成中的巨擘关系与分化
Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education
07
海外轨制复合体的等第与分化：比拟究诘的表面框架
Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research
08
海外轨制复合体中的价值分化、策略变化与合作
Value differentiation, policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes
皇冠比分本期摘录
社会环境迫害与地皮解决：中国在阿根廷基础开荒投资究诘
题目：Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina
作家：Sol Mora，圣马丁国立大学政事与政府学院阿根廷国度科学技巧究诘委员会 (CONICET) 的博士后究诘员。
摘录：本文通过分析地皮解决——颠倒是通过中国基础法子投资在阿根廷试图实施的地皮得回，在新葛兰西主张方法和拉丁好意思洲政事生态学之间建立了对话。在这两种不雅点之间架起桥梁，将罗伯特·考克斯的框架应用于地皮解决固有的社会和环境迫害的究诘。对阿根廷的两个地皮得回计较的究诘，其中一个被暂停，一个修改后陆续进行，标明社会遏抑不错制约通过投资过头执行进行地皮限度的尝试。因此，这两种表面不雅点之间的对话不仅使考克斯的念念想兴隆活力，而且将环境和当然解决历程中的社会环境迫害手脚IPE的新究诘标的。
This article establishes a dialogue between the neo-Gramscian approach and Latin American Political Ecology by analyzing land governance – specifically attempts at land grabbing through Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina. Building bridges between these two perspectives enables an application of Robert Cox’s framework to the study of socio-environmental conflicts inherent to land governance. The study of two land grabbing initiatives in Argentina, one that was suspended and one that continues with modifications, shows that social resistance can condition attempts at land control through investments and their execution. Consequently, the dialogue between these two theoretical perspectives not only revitalizes Cox’s thought but also highlights socio-environmental conflicts in environmental and nature governance processes as a new research direction for IPE.
皇冠客服飞机：@seo3687“非端庄”住房问题的政事经济学：后殖民国度的轨制羼杂性
题目：Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state
作家：Danish Khan，好意思国富兰克林与马歇尔学院经济系助理讲授兼“不对等、负责、权益和社会正义倡议”集会主任。
最近，欧洲杯中，一位年轻明星球员凭借着卓越表现获得们青睐，中不断挑战自我，成为全场焦点。据说这位球员还是一名才华音乐家，音乐作品备受喜爱。无论足球场还是音乐舞台，有着无比魅力。摘录：连年来，海外政事经济学（IPE）学者越来越情切城市问题。然而，他们主要情切的是特定的少数几个全球“城市”在休养成本、商品和奇迹的全球流动中的变装。尽管如斯，IPE文件中存在一个遑急的空缺在于对新目地主张全球化进度若何影响慈祥次位于全球南边城市的低收入“非端庄”住房部门的探索有限。为了弥补现存IPE文件中的这一空缺，本文在新目地主张荟萃轨制的布景下，对非正规住房假寓点的造成和祛除历程进行了批判性分析。非正规住房假寓点如故得到了批判性地地舆学家和城市究诘规模学者的庸俗究诘。本文一鸣惊人之处在于对IPE文件方面作念出了私有的孝敬，即行使非正规住房假寓点的政事经济学手脚批判性分析社会实质论和后殖民国度内在矛盾的切入点。本文觉得，通过“轨制羼杂性”的视角不错更好地矫健非正规住房假寓点与后殖民国度之间的关系。这个见解指的是后殖民国度内矛盾的社会经济和轨制刺激的会通，旨在同期束缚社会再坐褥和成本主张荟萃。社会再坐褥和荟萃之间固有的张力在非正规住房假寓点中以“仁慈-暴力”的辩证法容颜发挥出来。一方面，后殖民国度试图通过多端倪的权益蚁集“允许”边际化群体建立非正规住房假寓点，以发挥出“仁慈”的形象。另一方面，一朝边际化群体回绝了房地产主导的成本主张荟萃，后殖民国度将选拔暴力技能闭幕他们。因此，本文觉得，IPE学者应仔细探求非正规住房假寓点的政事经济学，因为它提供了关系后殖民国度若何受到调控并被不同的新目地主张全球化社会经济力量拉扯的机制的深刻视力。
In recent years, International Political Economy (IPE) scholars have increasingly turned their attention to cities. However, their primary focus has been on the role of a select few global 'cities’ that regulate global flows of capital, goods, and services. Nonetheless, a significant gap in the IPE literature pertains to the limited exploration of how processes of neoliberal globalization are impacting and regulating the low-income 'informal’ housing sector in cities located in the global South. To address this gap in the existing IPE literature, this paper critically analyzes the processes of formation and demolition of informal housing settlements against the backdrop of the neoliberal regime of accumulation. Informal housing settlements have been extensively examined by critical geographers and scholars in the field of urban studies. What distinguishes this paper is its unique contribution to the literature on IPE, that is, it utilizes the political economy of informal housing settlements as an entry point to critically analyze social ontology and the inherent contradictions of the postcolonial state. The paper argues that the relationship between informal housing settlements and the postcolonial state can be better understood through the lens of the 'institutional hybridity.’ This concept refers to the fusion of contradictory socio-economic and institutional impulses within the postcolonial state, which aims to manage social reproduction and capitalist accumulation simultaneously. The inherent tension between social reproduction and accumulation manifests in the informal housing settlements in the form of a dialectic of 'benevolence-violence.’ On one hand, the postcolonial state attempts to appear 'benevolent’ towards marginalized groups by 'allowing’ them to establish informal housing settlements through a multi-layered network of clientelism. On the other hand, the postcolonial state resorts to violent displacement of marginalized groups as soon as they pose obstacles to real estate-led capitalist accumulation. Thus, the paper contends that IPE scholars should carefully consider the political economy of informal housing settlements, as it provides captivating insights into the mechanisms through which the postcolonial state becomes subject to regulation and is pulled in different directions by the socio-economic forces of neoliberal globalization.主权危险金融中的海外轨制的复杂性：区域架构的比拟
题目：International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures
作家：C. Randall Henning，好意思利坚大学海外奇迹学院海外经济关系讲授。
摘录：海外轨制复杂性表面框定了海外合作的预期，这种预期源自不同机构体系中等第和互异化组合。本文比拟了2000年至2019年时期，东亚、拉丁好意思洲和欧元区危险金融区域复杂体系中地区金融安排与海外货币基金组织之间的关系，并对进修了这些预期。手脚全球和地区机构之间的错乱国度，债权国在弃取这些复杂体系的架构（等第和互异化的组合）方面尤其具有影响力，但受到前几十年所采取的安排的遗弃。一朝弃取了复杂体系的架构，它反过来将影响借款国的策略调整和国度在不平定机构时是追求轨制飘浮如故建立竞争性轨制。这些发现总体上安妥预期，但超出了核激情论对欧元区策略调整的预期程度。机构间的协周折态填补了这一解释差距。本文的论断是，机构之间的关系关于矫健轨制复杂体系的末端和演变至关遑急，况兼比单一轨制主张、权益差距假说和其他替代方法提供的解释更竣工。
金沙娱乐博彩平台The theory of international regime complexity that frames this study specifies expectations for international cooperation stemming from different combinations of hierarchy and differentiation among institutions in regime complexes. This paper compares relationships between regional financial arrangements and the International Monetary Fund in the regional complexes for crisis finance in East Asia, Latin America, and the euro area during 2000-2019 and tests these expectations. Creditor states that sit at the nexus between global and regional institutions are particularly influential in the choice of architecture (the combination of hierarchy and differentiation) for these complexes but are constrained by arrangements inherited from previous decades. Once chosen, the complex’s architecture in turn shapes policy adjustment in borrowing countries and influences whether states pursue regime shifting or competitive regime creation when dissatisfied with institutions. These findings generally coincide with expectations, but exceed the degree of policy adjustment that the core theory expected for the euro area. Interinstitutional collaboration, the dynamics of which are elaborated, fills this explanatory gap. The paper concludes that relations among institutions are essential for understanding the outcomes and evolution of regime complexes and underpin a more complete explanation than provided by singular institutionalism, the power-gap hypothesis and other alternative approaches.
核不扩散轨制复合体系的不矫健性
题目：The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex
作家：Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni，剑桥大学政事与海外究诘系海外组织和全球政事学讲授
摘录：本文对核不扩散轨制复合体系的轨制架构中旅途依赖性的变化进行了表面分析，并分析了不同轨制复合结构对机构竞争和策略调整的影响。首先，我建议了一个一般性表面，申诉了海外轨制复合体系（IRCs）的先有的轨制结构若何以一种使IRC易于内生旅途依赖性变化的方法促进和遗弃随后的轨制发展。接下来，我申诉了在核不扩散复合体系中，轨制飘浮和竞争性轨制建立策略若何激励了旅途依赖性的“响应序列”，导致轨制分裂日益加重。为了证明IRC演变的内生能源，我在三个“关节时刻”注视了核不扩散复合体系：20世纪70年代中期、冷战达成时期和21世纪初。在每个时期，外生的扩散冲击与现存的机构结构相互作用，产生了特定的竞争模式，从而激励了日益加重的轨制分裂的响应序列。我的论点关于全球经济解决具有庸俗的适用性，并对接续增长的海外政事经济学文件探讨全球解决机构中的响应序列和轨制雕残具有遑急兴味。
This article theorizes path-dependent changes in the institutional architecture of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex; it analyses the effects of different regime-complex structures on institutional contestation and policy adjustment. I first offer a general theory of how the preexisting institutional structures of international regime complexes (IRCs) facilitate and constrain subsequent institutional developments in ways that make IRCs prone to endogenous, path-dependent change. Next, I illustrate how strategies of regime shifting and rival regime creation in the nuclear nonproliferation complex have triggered path-dependent 'reactive sequencing’, resulting in growing institutional fragmentation. To illustrate endogenous dynamics of IRC evolution, I examine the nuclear nonproliferation complex at three 'critical junctures’: The mid-1970s, the end of the Cold War, and the early-2000s. During each period, exogenous proliferation shocks interacted with pre-existing institutional structures to produce specific patterns of contestation which set in motion a reactive sequence of growing institutional fragmentation. My argument has relevance for global economic governance broadly and for the growing IPE literature which explores reactive sequencing and institutional decay in global governance institutions.
解决蚁集空间：跨组织的策略范畴的政事
题目：Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations
作家：Stephanie C. Hofmann，欧洲大学究诘所政事与社会科学系讲授和罗伯特·舒曼高档究诘中心海外关系集会主席；Patryk Pawlak，卡内基欧洲究诘中心的探望学者和欧洲大学究诘所（佛罗伦萨）罗伯特·舒曼高档究诘中心兼职讲授。
摘录：策略范畴和问题相互依存并非是既定的。它们所触及的锋利关系——由谁解决、若何解决以及策略规模在那处——跟着时分的推移被轨制化，这平日是由全球朔方国度首先制定。咱们对这些锋利关系如安在组织里面和跨组织轨制化的方法知之甚少。为此，咱们通过探究一个新兴策略规模如安在一个高度轨制化的环境中，若何和取得什么效率来填补这个空缺。咱们觉得，新策略规模，如蚁集空间或东谈主工智能，促使政府周折资源通过将前程性的问题团员在新组织和现存组织中进行择地弃取策略框架，以开荒定约合作。率先，志同谈合的国度在组织中更有可能产生共识，从而导致部分互异化的非等第轨制复合体。永久而言，竞争性的压力调整，尤其南半球国度所感受到的压力，有助于激励轨制向一个息争的一般性组织的轨制更动。关节的活动者必须再行调整他们的框架，从而减少互异。在现在的地缘政事全国中，这加重了组织里面政事不合。咱们在蚁集空间的案例中进修了三个命题，并展示了跨组织竞争框架的扩散若何导致策略申辩飘浮到集会国，而在集会国只可进行破裂的策略调整。咱们的分析基于一手尊府和千里浸式策略。
Policy boundaries and issue interdependence are not a given. The stakes they imply—who governs, how, and where a policy domain is—become institutionalized over time, often first by the Global North. We know little about how these stakes are presented and institutionalized within and across organizations. We tackle this lacuna by asking how, and to what effect, an emerging policy domain is situated in a densely institutionalized environment. We argue that new policy domains such as cyberspace or artificial intelligence prompt resourceful governments to forum-shop policy frames by clustering promising issues in new and existing organizations in pursuit of coalition-building. Initially, resonance is more likely to be established in organizations with like-minded countries, leading to partially differentiated non-hierarchical regime complexes. In the long-term, competing adjustment pressures, particularly felt in the Global South, help trigger a regime-shift to an orchestrating general-purpose organization. Key actors must reconfigure their frames thereby reducing differentiation. In today’s geopolitical world, this hardens intra-organizational political differences. We examine three propositions in the case of cyberspace and show how the proliferation of competing frames across organizations led to shifting the policy debate to the UN, where only piecemeal policy adjustments are possible. Our analysis is based on primary sources and immersion strategies.
与轨制的复杂架构：海外赞成中的巨擘关系与分化
题目：Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education
皇冠hg86a
作家：Rie Kijima，多伦多大学蒙克全球事务与各人策略学院的助理讲授；Phillip Y. Lipscy，多伦多大学政事学系和蒙克全球事务与各人策略学院讲授，及东京大学法学院讲授。
摘录：轨制复杂性的决定要素和后果是什么？咱们觉得，海外议题规模的特征——蚁集效应和插足壁垒——影响了可行竞争的程度，并对巨擘关系、轨制互异化和实质性末端产生了遑急影响。竞争倾向于侵蚀现存轨制的主导地位，减弱等第轨制。竞争下的互异化因权益和物资资源而异：纷乱的国度试图通过引入无互异化的机构来更动近况，而资源有限的活动者则倾向于针对互异化的利基市集。实质性末端的互异取决于开动的轨制成就，颠倒是在率先被赋予权益的活动者更可能从竞争中失利。咱们通过究诘海外赞成轨制复杂体系（这是一个具有极其遑急性但不时被漠视的议题规模）来发展这个表面并测试四个假定。
What are the determinants and consequences of regime complexity? We argue that characteristics of international issue areas – network effects and entry barriers – affect the degree of feasible competition, with important consequences for authority relations, institutional differentiation, and substantive outcomes. Competition tends to erode the dominance of status quo institutions, diminishing hierarchy. Differentiation under competition varies according to power and material resources: Powerful states seek to shift the status quo by introducing undifferentiated institutions, while actors with limited resources tend to target differentiated niches. Variation in substantive outcomes depends on the initial configuration of institutions, particularly which actors are originally empowered and thus stand to lose from competition. We develop this theory and test four hypotheses by examining the regime complex for international education, a substantively important but often neglected issue area.
海外轨制复合体的等第与分化：比拟究诘的表面框架
题目：Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research
作家：C. Randall Henning，好意思利坚大学海外奇迹学院海外经济关系讲授；Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政事学助理讲授。
摘录：海外轨制复杂性的见解提供了一个有效的视角来究诘全球解决中海外机构的接续增多。越来越多的海外政事经济学（IPE）文件指出，很多遑急策略规模存在重迭的机构集群，然而一些学者觉得，复杂性减弱了解决效力，而另一些学者则觉得散布的机构优于吞并的机构。为了使这些发现具有连贯性，咱们建议了一个一般的表面框架，基于两个结构特征来态状轨制复杂性：巨擘关系和机构分化。这些维度共同决定了国度和其他活动者在罢黜轨制次序时所靠近的机遇和遗弃。因此，它们塑造了遑急的末端，举例策略调整、轨制飘浮和创建竞争性轨制。本文建议了关系巨擘和分化效应的可进修假定，并评估它们与本专题的五篇同伴著作所究诘的八个轨制复杂体的对应关系。咱们进一步笃定了一组塑造轨制复杂体随时分演变的动态历程。咱们的框架加强了轨制复杂体的比拟分析基础，并为究诘计较提供了新的议程。
The concept of international regime complexity offers a useful lens for examining the increasing density of international institutions in global governance. A growing literature in International Political Economy (IPE) identifies clusters of overlapping institutions in many important policy areas, yet some scholars argue that complexity undermines governance effectiveness, while others perceive distinct advantages over unified institutions. To bring coherence to these findings, we present a general theoretical framework that characterizes regime complexes based on two structural features: Authority relations and institutional differentiation. These dimensions jointly determine the opportunities and constraints that states and other actors confront as they navigate institutional rules. As a result, they shape important outcomes, such as policy adjustment, regime shifting and competitive regime creation. The article proposes testable hypotheses regarding the effects of authority and differentiation, and we assess their correspondence with the eight regime complexes examined by the five companion articles in this special issue. We further identify a set of dynamic processes that shape the evolution of regime complexes over time. Our framework strengthens the foundation for comparative analysis of regime complexes and charts a new agenda for the research program.
海外轨制复合体中的价值分化、策略变化与合作
题目：Value differentiation, policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes
作家：Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政事学助理讲授。
摘录：在海外政事经济学(IPE)的很多议题规模中，国度间的合作受到密集的、不同但重迭的海外机构蚁集的束缚。这种“轨制复杂性”环境是增强如故减弱合作一直备受争议。有东谈主觉得，重迭的机构增强了正当性和天真性，而其他东谈主则觉得，契机主张的择地弃取使得国度大略秘籍遵守严格的次序。本文长入了这个争论，解说轨制复杂性会根据轨制之间的价值互异程度产生不同的影响。在那些不具互异化机构手脚替代品的议题规模中，择地弃取会缩短轨制拘谨国度活动的才气。然而，在那些轨制机构通过价值辨别的问题规模中，即即跟着次序变得愈加严格，它们提供的平正也会增多，机构重迭不错促使国度策略变革。本文阐述了这一动态变化，并在对选举不雅察和与丛林联系的碳抵偿的政权复合体进行比拟分析时提供了教育字据。
In many issue areas in international political economy (IPE), interstate cooperation is governed by a dense network of distinct but overlapping international institutions. Whether this environment of 'regime complexity’ strengthens or undermines cooperation is a subject of intense debate. Some argue that overlapping institutions enhance legitimacy and flexibility, while others claim that opportunistic forum shopping enables states to escape compliance with rigorous rules. This article reconciles this debate, demonstrating that regime complexity has contrasting effects depending on the degree of value differentiation among institutions. In issue areas where undifferentiated institutions function as substitutes, forum shopping will reduce the regime’s ability to discipline state behavior. However, in issue areas where institutions are differentiated by value – i.e. the benefits they provide increase as rules become more rigorous – institutional overlap can increase policy change among states. I demonstrate these dynamics formally and provide empirical evidence in a comparative analysis of the regime complexes for election observation and forest-related carbon offsets.
编译 | 朱嘉成 崔育涞
菲律宾四大博彩公司校对 | 崔育涞 朱嘉成
排版 | 赵弘宇
本文源于《海外政事经济学褒贬》，本文为公益共享，奇迹于科研教授，不代表本平台不雅点。如有迫害，接待指正。
图片
本站仅提供存储奇迹，通盘内容均由用户发布，如发现存害或侵权内容，请点击举报。